<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>CSS Mastery on Justin Carmony</title>
		<link>https://www.justincarmony.com/tags/css-mastery/</link>
		<description>Recent content in CSS Mastery on Justin Carmony</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.justincarmony.com/tags/css-mastery/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>CSS – I’m 100% Converted</title>
				<link>https://www.justincarmony.com/2009/01/08/css-im-100-converted/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.justincarmony.com/2009/01/08/css-im-100-converted/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;It has been a hard, long road. But these last few days, I&amp;rsquo;ve finally have reached a realization of a great step in my life as a web design: I&amp;rsquo;m 100% converted to CSS layouts, and have forsaken tables. 5 years ago I would have believed that would be impossible, and that I would love and use tables for my layouts until the day I die. I remember hearing the lectures and heated discussions on using CSS instead, but I couldn&amp;rsquo;t bring myself to using CSS for layouts. Don&amp;rsquo;t get me wrong, using CSS was amazing for &lt;strong&gt;formatting&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;styling&lt;/strong&gt;, such a color, size, bolding, etc. I love it every second and my conversion to CSS for those scenarios was very quick. However, the positioning of content, headers, footers, side menus and navigation was a nightmare for me at first. I just didn&amp;rsquo;t get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
