<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Designers on Justin Carmony</title>
		<link>https://www.justincarmony.com/tags/designers/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Designers on Justin Carmony</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 05:29:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.justincarmony.com/tags/designers/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Thoughts on HBR&#39;s &#34;Seven Rules for Managing Creative People&#34;</title>
				<link>https://www.justincarmony.com/2013/04/08/thoughts-on-hbrs-seven-rules-for-managing-creative-people/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 05:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.justincarmony.com/2013/04/08/thoughts-on-hbrs-seven-rules-for-managing-creative-people/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Today I saw a few mentions on twitter about a blog post by the Harvard Business Review on the &lt;a href=&#34;http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/04/seven_rules_for_managing_creat.html&#34;&gt;Seven Rules for Managing Creative People&lt;/a&gt;. The reaction has been rather, well, negative from those who are &amp;ldquo;creative people.&amp;rdquo; Some thought it had to be an April Fool&amp;rsquo;s joke, but it was published on the 2nd, not the 1st. The article acknowledges the great value creative people have in a company, but then is condescending in it&amp;rsquo;s recommendations for managing them. The big issue was #5: Pay them poorly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
