<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Mozilla on Justin Carmony</title>
		<link>https://www.justincarmony.com/tags/mozilla/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Mozilla on Justin Carmony</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:50:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.justincarmony.com/tags/mozilla/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Why Google Chrome is Good for FireFox</title>
				<link>https://www.justincarmony.com/2008/09/11/why-google-chrome-is-good-for-firefox/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.justincarmony.com/2008/09/11/why-google-chrome-is-good-for-firefox/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://www.justincarmony.com/images/wp/2008/09/google-chrome-helps-mozilla-firefox.jpg&#34; alt=&#34;google-chrome-helps-mozilla-firefox.jpg&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve heard time after time people saying how FireFox might take a backseat to Google Chrome. However, I actually think Chrome and FireFox will benefit from each other. I think FireFox has nothing but to gain from Google Chrome. Let me give you an example why:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;My brother Bryce works at Best Buy. They&amp;rsquo;ve been selling Apple Macs for the last few months and Bryce hates selling them to customers. The reason is people come in, say they want a Mac because they&amp;rsquo;ve heard so much about them, don&amp;rsquo;t listening to any suggestions or tips, and just buy it. That would be great, except usually within 1-2 weeks they come back wanting to return their Mac. Why Bryce asks why, one of the classic responses is &amp;ldquo;Well, I couldn&amp;rsquo;t find Internet Explorer.&amp;rdquo; These customers have been so accustomed to doing things their way that they don&amp;rsquo;t understand how to use anything else.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Thunderbird Email Client: A Guide for Outlook Lovers (Part 1)</title>
				<link>https://www.justincarmony.com/2008/02/23/thunderbird-email-client-a-guide-for-outlook-lovers-part-1/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.justincarmony.com/2008/02/23/thunderbird-email-client-a-guide-for-outlook-lovers-part-1/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h3 id=&#34;overview&#34;&gt;Overview&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been using Thunderbird over the last year or so, and especially with version 2.0 I think it is a great client. In my opinion, it is the only decent email client that can compete with the easy of use of Outlook, yet totally dominate Outlook when coming to not being a bloated pig. I&amp;rsquo;m sorry, but when I run 4 IMAP accounts, and I have a PC with 4 gigs of RAM and a quad core processor, and Outlook is so slow and takes minutes to become responsive, it is just bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
