<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Thunderbird on Justin Carmony</title>
		<link>https://www.justincarmony.com/tags/thunderbird/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Thunderbird on Justin Carmony</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:04:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.justincarmony.com/tags/thunderbird/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Thunderbird Email Client: A Guide for Outlook Lovers (Part 1)</title>
				<link>https://www.justincarmony.com/2008/02/23/thunderbird-email-client-a-guide-for-outlook-lovers-part-1/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.justincarmony.com/2008/02/23/thunderbird-email-client-a-guide-for-outlook-lovers-part-1/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h3 id=&#34;overview&#34;&gt;Overview&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been using Thunderbird over the last year or so, and especially with version 2.0 I think it is a great client. In my opinion, it is the only decent email client that can compete with the easy of use of Outlook, yet totally dominate Outlook when coming to not being a bloated pig. I&amp;rsquo;m sorry, but when I run 4 IMAP accounts, and I have a PC with 4 gigs of RAM and a quad core processor, and Outlook is so slow and takes minutes to become responsive, it is just bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
